Contact us
Back to insights

Strategic School Improvement Capital Budget (SSICB) Explained

Author Thumbnail

Robert Gould FRICS

Partner at Barker Associates | Award-Winning Integrated Property Consultants

Overview

The Department for Education (DfE) has released its guidance on Strategic School Improvement Capital Budget (SSICB) to support academy transfers where urgent capital issues pose a barrier to sponsorship. This funding is distinct from the Condition Improvement Fund (CIF) and is designed to unlock school improvement opportunities by addressing critical site challenges during transfer. 

Purpose of SSICB

SSICB is a targeted capital funding stream aimed at enabling school transfers that would otherwise be unviable due to severe building condition, safeguarding, or suitability issues. It is not a general funding pot, but a strategic tool to facilitate improvement through trust sponsorship. 

Eligibility Criteria

Funding may be available for: 

  • Full or intermediate sponsorships 
  • Fast-track academy projects 
  • Transfers under intervention 

However, eligibility is tightly controlled. Applications must be made before the transfer – retrospective bids are not accepted. The DfE will assess: 

  • The urgency and severity of the capital need 
  • Whether the incoming trust has sufficient reserves to cover the works 
  • The strategic value of the transfer 

Trusts should not assume funding will be granted and must engage early with their DfE Regions Group Delivery Officer. 

 

What SSICB Can Fund

SSICB supports urgent, high-cost capital works only. Examples include: 

  • Condition: Repairs or upgrades to buildings (excluding expansion) 
  • ICT Infrastructure: Network improvements (not hardware purchases) 
  • Safeguarding: Fencing, asbestos removal, or other safety-critical works 
  • Suitability: In rare cases, modifications to make spaces fit for teaching where current facilities severely hinder learning 

The DfE applies a strict threshold – only critical needs are considered, not desirable enhancements. 

 

Responsibilities of Trusts and Outgoing Bodies

Outgoing responsible bodies are expected to have met their legal duties around safety and safeguarding. If not, they may be asked to contribute to remedial works. Incoming trusts must plan for long-term maintenance through their School Condition Allocation (SCA). SSICB is not a substitute for ongoing capital planning – it is a short-term, exceptional measure. 

Strategic Implications for Trusts

For Multi Academy Trusts SSICB offers a pathway to take on schools previously deemed too risky due to site condition. It can help unlock growth and improvement opportunities, but only in exceptional cases. Trusts must: 

  • Conduct thorough due diligence on site condition 
  • Engage early with DfE regional teams 
  • Be prepared to demonstrate financial need and strategic rationale 

Conclusion

SSICB is a valuable tool but use cases will be limited. It reflects the DfE’s commitment to removing barriers to school improvement through trust sponsorship, while maintaining high standards for capital investment. Trusts considering new acquisitions should factor SSICB into their strategic planning but not rely on it as a guaranteed solution. 

Got a project in mind?
Let’s bring that vision to life.

Our experience and vision have shaped hundreds of projects across sectors, from energy and funding to architecture and design, helping bring ideas to life.

The team at Barkers discuss a Building Construction Project around a table at their office in Braintree, Essex.
See
the project